Ethical Theories Essay Example for Free

Ethical Theories EssayA fair play is a trait of a true person that is valued as organism beloved from a fussy point of view and answers the heading of what actions argon honourable and what argon not. Also, morality is the basis of being respectablely correct and good. There had been some(prenominal) distinct ethical theories that exist in the family and each having different standards or basis for morality. whizz of the well known theories in the contemporary time in the field is virtuousness morality which is unmatchable of the 3 major normative ethics approaches. Virtue ethics originated in the ancient Greek time that takes inspiration from the works of the Greek philosopher, Aristotle while other theories in virtue ethics also co-ordinated elements from the works of Hume, Plato, Aquinas and as well as Nietzsche. Basically, virtue ethics gives importance on the reference work of a person. Thus, it is the contribution of a person that is the key element and the basis of being good or morally correct rather than laws/rules or even the consequences or outcome brought about by a particular action. According to virtue ethics, we should look at the character of a person rather than his or her duties and actions. It is how wizard basis be better person that is habituated tenseness rather than the right subject to do. It is easy to live a virtuous life according to Aristotle and that the main reason for those who do so is to be happy. Thus, a virtuous life gives happiness which is the main or net goal of both human being according to virtue ethics. In order to become a better person, virtue ethics suggest that one must practice virtuous acts on a regular basis. These acts leave behind eventually become habitual and thus, making the habit of doing such acts as a natural daylight to day activity which in the long run, go out make the person a better being. Thus, the ultimate aim of the particular person is to make people happy. Virtue ethics suggests that a person financial support a virtuous life willing eventually do virtuous things not only to be happy but as well as to make people happy which in give will be their main objective and goal in life of a virtues person. Virtue ethics also assumes that all humans have capacities that are inherited and that, as stated earlier, actions that could improve these capacities are considered as ethical and those that hinder the improvement of these capacities are not, that is, if an action is able to develop the potential of the particular person, it is the morally right thing to do and otherwise, morally wrong. These, inherited potentials, according to ethical theories are wiseness and intelligence and so, in order to live a virtues life, we must be able to develop our erudition and intelligence. Thus, rather than trying to define goodness or moralness, improving ones character is given the importance and is the basis of ethically good actions and is virtue ethics central theme. By giving emphasis on the persons being rather than actions, virtue ethics aims to achieve something that is genuinely cute by the person rather than focusing on the incoherent ideas about the after-life which are found to be arguable. It is verbalise that virtue ethics is applicable to all, great deal easily be understood and fits into both res publica and donts of philosophies and as well as religion. Therefore, it is like a combination of both religion and philosophy. either ethical scheme suggests standards of morality and according to virtue ethics, right actions are the results of being a moral person. It is by becoming a moral person that we will eventually know what actions are righteous from what are wrong and thus, we flourished as human beings. Virtue ethics also suggests that virtue is an important and admirable human characteristic just as courage and kindness. Virtue ethics also suggests that a good night club is a result and accomplishments of v irtuous people in that particular community.Thus, it can be said the virtue ethics is far more different than other ethical theories present such as Consequentialism that focuses on the results of a current actions or Deontology that focuses on certain rules and duties of every individual as flummox by the society. Consequentialism would ask what actions will bring the most benefit and the least harm to the persons that are concern and will be affected by the action.On the other hand, Deontology will ask what actions are O.K. by the society and that are accordance to the moral rules or laws as dictated by the society or culture. Still, as mentioned earlier, virtue ethics does not focus on the action itself or on the result of that action or even in the set of rules that are present in the society but rather, on the character of the person involved in making the decision. By evaluating the points of these ethical theories, it can be said that all have their own strength and as we ll as adynamic points when it comes to decision making and one cannot be considered as superior to the other. Still, taking either side will also be dependent on the points of view of the person making the decision. One problem with virtue ethics is that it is mostly not applicable or of little help to persons who are facing dilemma. The identical thing also goes for Consequentialism and Deontology. If for example, you can save a friend by lying to a certain person or group, would lying be the action by a virtuous man or is it considered as a simple lie that a virtuous man should avoid? In this case, it can be said that virtue ethics cannot be applied and does not help the person in making a decision. Another problem faced by virtue ethics is that it cannot justify a certain problem for doing so would require a basis of what is moral. In this case, the decision on which virtues are considered morally correct and which are not are has to be made which is unquestionably a challeng ing thing to do. Thus justifying certain actions based on what virtues are moral and what are not are still a big question. On the other hand, it can also be said that the one of the distinct strength of virtue ethics is that it gives emphasis on the connection between our characters and our acts. It also views our character as whole and unified rather than treating each as isolated when it comes to making ethical decisions. Thus, a persons virtue is considered as a totality and not as fragment of different aspects and that one character/trait is not isolated from the other. Thus, virtue ethics looks at the individual, something that most ethical theories fail to do. There is no absolute theory that exists in which all will agree that it is definitely the right standard of living a virtuous life. Thus, every theory has its own critique and opponents. This is because of the battle in the experiences, knowledge and points of view of every individual, being unique in different ways. T hus, an ultimate theory can never really exist.The actions that must be taken by every individual defends on both his or her experiences and values together with the situation at hand and no theory will be able to solely suggest what ought to be and not be done. Therefore, decision making is not just a matter of theories and principles but of experiences, knowledge of the situation and of the people involved and the complete being of a person making the decision.ReferenceStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2000). Virtue Ethics. Retrieved April 28, 2008 from http//plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/3