Article Analysis - Gun Control :: Constituton Bill Rights Right To Bear Arms

Article Analysis - Gun ControlThe term, Taking advise at Gun Control by Daniel D. Polsby and Dennis Brennen was written October 30, 1995 for the Heartland Executive Summary. The article deals with current gun take for issues, and uses both statistical information, and randy political theory to convince you of the authors intellection. The article is broken down into five champion topics, that atomic number 18 each supported by statistical information. In the first sub topic the main heading claims, There is no race mingled with the number of privately owned guns and the amount of violent crime in the United States. It is then supported with the statistics that gun ownership has increased by forty-five percent, and the homicide rate fell by ten percent. The article also quotes various studies taken from criminologists, such as Gary Kleck and E. Britt Patterson. The authors tend to part their argument with factual information. They then use that information to cultivate t heir emotional argument. This can be seen in each of the sub topics. The first terzetto topics, There is no relationship between the number of privately owned guns and the amount of violent crimes in the United States, There is no relationship between gun control laws and violent crime, and Data from the City of moolah cast further doubt on the effectiveness of gun control laws, use studies and statistics to prove their point. The last two sub topics, Why do gun control laws fail? and What do we do about crime and violence?, offer the authors emotional argument. This is the section of the article where the true opinion of the two authors is seen. They sum up their beliefs, with what they consider to be a break out solution to improving participation without gun control. They suggest that by educating the reality on proper gun safety and handling, fewer people would be hurt. It is also their belief that by making guns more accessible to liable citizens, criminals would be less l ikely to commit acts of violence. They speculate that an armed society would be able to pr planet criminals from perpetrating a crime before it is even committed.